Assisted reproductive technology | assisted reproductive technology
ReviewIDDateassessedasup‐to‐dateNumberofincludedtrialsPopulationInterventionComparisonintervention/controlOutcomesReviewlimitations1.IndicationforARTZP672Pandian2015[1]Invitrofertilisationforunexplainedsubfertility4/5/20158RCTs1774coupleswithunexplainedsubfertilityInvitrofertilisationExpectantmanagementIntrauterineinseminationIntrauterineinsemination+ovarianstimulationLivebirthClinicalpregnancyMultiplepregnancyOHSSSeriousimprecisionresultingfromsmallstudynumbersandloweventratesAMY731Yossry20...
Review ID
Date assessed as up‐to‐date
Number of included trials
Population
Intervention
Comparison intervention/control
Outcomes
Review limitations
1. Indication for ART
ZP672
Pandian 2015[1]
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility
4/5/2015
8 RCTs
1774 couples with unexplained subfertility
In vitro fertilisation
Expectant management
Intrauterine insemination
Intrauterine insemination +
ovarian stimulation
Live birth
Clinical pregnancy Multiple pregnancy OHSS
Serious imprecision resulting from small study numbers and low event rates
AMY731
Yossry 2006[2]
In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation
15/05/2009
No RCTs
N/A
In vitro fertilisation
...